@HighwayToHall
IBM Presents: You make the call.[1] A man, let’s call him Fred, is a college student. All of his courses are graded on a curve. He receives all A’s and B’s his first 2 years of school. His final two years, however, many of the other students cheat. As a result, most of these students score higher than Fred who chose not to cheat. Even though his test scores are comparable to what they were his first two years, after the curve is factored in, he is now a C-student. As a result, he no longer makes the Dean’s List and he does not graduate with Honors. Upon graduation, it is discovered half the school cheated and the ensuing scandal rocks the nation. None of the cheaters can find jobs. Unfortunately, neither can Fred. Potential employers continue to focus on his grades. “You didn’t make Dean’s List.” “You didn’t graduate with honors.” “Your grades don’t compare to other people in your class.” Fred just wants to scream, “They all cheated. Their cheating prevented me from graduating with honors. Why are you comparing me to them?”
How do we resolve this situation? What would be the fair
thing to do? You make the call.
While you ponder that, let’s discuss the Hall of Fame
candidacy of Fred McGriff.
PA
|
R
|
H
|
2B
|
HR
|
RBI
|
BA
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
10174
|
1349
|
2490
|
441
|
493
|
1550
|
.284
|
.377
|
.509
|
.886
|
Next, let’s talk about the pre-PED era company McGriff
shares with these numbers. Through 2000, 9 players in history retired with
10,000+ plate appearances and an OPS of .886 or higher. The list is so
impressive, first names are not necessary: Ruth, Musial, Ott, Cobb, Mays,
Aaron, Speaker, Robinson, and Schmidt.[2]
Let’s look at another list. Through 2000, 17 men collected
2000 hits, 450 home runs, 1500 RBIs, and 1000 walks. Once again, we will skip
the first names: Ruth, Williams, Gehrig. Foxx, Mantle, Musial, Ott, Mays,
Aaron, Robinson, Schmidt, McCovey, Killebrew, Jackson, Yastrzemski, Murray, and
Winfield. In fact, as of McGriff’s retirement in 2004, this list included 20
men, the aforementioned 17 Hall of Famers, and McGriff, Bonds, and Palmeiro.[3]
That is certainly a good start to support McGriff’s
candidacy. What else can we present? We discussed McGriff last year when we
evaluated each player on the ballot, let’s present that information again.
In 1992, McGriff
led the National League with 35 homers, the lowest total to lead the National
League in a non-strike season since Ralph Kiner hit 23 in 1946. Although his
home run numbers may look pedestrian now after the “Juiced Ball Era,” McGriff
was one of the top power hitters of his time, finishing in the top 10 among all
Major Leaguers in homers 7 consecutive seasons. How rare is that? Here’s the
list:
Number of times
|
Player
|
Years
|
16
|
Babe Ruth
|
1918-33
|
14
|
Lou Gehrig
|
1925-38
|
12
|
Jimmie Foxx
|
1929-40
|
9
|
Hank Aaron
|
1965-73
|
9
|
Eddie Mathews
|
1952-60
|
9
|
Mel Ott
|
1931-39
|
9
|
Mike Schmidt
|
1979-87
|
8
|
Gavvy Cravath
|
1912-19
|
8
|
Joe DiMaggio
|
1936-42, 46
|
8
|
Ralph Kiner
|
1946-53
|
8
|
Mickey Mantle
|
1954-61
|
7
|
Napoleon Lajoie
|
1897-1903
|
7
|
Fred McGriff
|
1988-94
|
7
|
Frank Robinson
|
1956-62
|
7
|
Harry Stovey
|
1880-86
|
7
|
Cy Williams
|
1918-24
|
7
|
Ken Williams
|
1921-27
|
The list above
contains twelve Hall of Famers, 4 non-Hall of Famers born before Babe Ruth, and
Fred McGriff. McGriff was the last player to join this group and the first
since Mike Schmidt, who in turn was the first since Hank Aaron. Not only was
McGriff one of the top power hitters of his generation, he was a model of
consistency. Fifteen times he hit twenty or more home runs, to join this
illustrious group:
Seasons
|
Player
|
20
|
Hank Aaron
|
19
|
Barry Bonds
|
17
|
Willie Mays
|
17
|
Frank Robinson
|
16
|
Babe Ruth
|
16
|
Ted Williams
|
16
|
Jim Thome
|
16
|
Reggie Jackson
|
16
|
Eddie Murray
|
15
|
Fred McGriff
|
15
|
Mel Ott
|
15
|
Willie Stargell
|
15
|
Dave Winfield
|
15
|
Ken Griffey, Jr.
|
15
|
Alex Rodriguez
|
McGriff was a
feared part of any lineup he was in, but never more so than when he was traded
to Atlanta. In 1993, McGriff was traded from San Diego to Atlanta and his
second half tear helped the Braves hold off San Francisco (who finished 103-59)
to win the National League West. That season with the Braves he batted .310
with 19 home runs and 55 RBIs and led them to a 51-19 record after his arrival.
In the National League Championship Series against Philadelphia, McGriff batted
.435 with 4 RBIs but the Braves lost in 6 games. In 1994, McGriff batted .310
with 34 home runs before the season was called because of the player strike.
McGriff led Atlanta to the next two World Series, winning one title in 1995
against Cleveland. In 50 career postseason games, McGriff batted .303 with 10
home runs and 37 RBIs.
Among cleanup hitters, McGriff ranks 2nd in plate
appearances behind Murray, 5th in runs behind Gehrig, Murray,
DiMaggio, and Ramirez, 3rd in hits (Murray and Gehrig), 3rd
in RBIs (Murray and Gehrig), and 4th in HRs (Gehrig, Ramirez, and
Belle).
All of these
credentials are quite impressive. Unfortunately, McGriff retired with 493 home runs. The strike quite
possibly cost him the 7 home runs needed to reach 500.
Now, this is a
good spot to look at the arguments against him. Let’s begin by looking
at Jay Jaffe’s presentation:
“Despite the lack of 500 homers, McGriff’s case for
Cooperstown appears to have some merit; he scores 100 (“a good possibility”) on
the Bill James Hall of Fame Monitor for his five All-Star appearances, two home
run titles and postseason performances, and 48 (slightly below average) on
James’ Hall of Fame Standards metric, which similarly credits him for career
accomplishments relative to players already in the Hall. That said, he never
won an MVP award and had just one top-five finish in the voting, and he didn’t
add anything with his defense.”[4]
It is certainly true McGriff brought nothing to the table
with his defense. That we can’t change. But what about the other arguments? He
never won an MVP award and had just one top-five finish. Now we get into the
“guys were cheating” argument, as well as the “How do we evaluate Colorado’s
hitters” argument. In 1988, Mike Greenwell finished second in MVP voting to
Jose Canseco. After Canseco’s admission of steroid usage, Greenwell asked,
“Where’s my MVP? [Canseco’s] an admitted steroid user. I was clean. If they’re
going to start putting asterisks by things, let’s put one by the MVP.”[5]
But let’s not stop there. Let’s put asterisks by the MVP voting as a whole. And
not just due to PED-users, but the hitting environment in Colorado.
In 1995, McGriff finished 20th in MVP voting. Dante Bichette, 1 of 4 Colorado players to receive MVP votes, finished 2nd. In 71 games in Colorado, he batted .377 with 31 homers, 83 RBIs, and a 1.152 OPS. In 68 road games, he batted .300, with 9 homers, 45 RBIs, and an OPS of .802. McGriff didn’t have an astounding season, but batted .280 with 27 homers, 93 RBIs, and an .850 OPS in a strike-shortened season (he played in a league leading 144 games). His home/road splits were comparable, though he hit for a higher average at home. Should McGriff have finished in the top-5. Who knows? But thanks to PEDs and Colorado, McGriff’s strongest attributes were diminished. Players like Palmeiro, Mo Vaughn, and Rico Brogna finished with higher WARs that season.
Jaffe continues, “In all, he’s 13 wins below the career WAR
standard among first basemen and 6.3 wins—nearly one per year—below the peak
standard. His JAWS falls 9.7 shy of the standard for first baseman, good enough
for 27th on the all-time list…While it would be a nice moral to the
story if McGriff were to gain entry to Cooperstown while those connected to
PEDs remained outside, as it is, he just doesn’t quite have the numbers. It
bears remembering that at least via JAWS, McGriff isn’t being measured against
McGwire and Palmeiro but against those already enshrined at his position, such
as Gehrig, Perez, Eddie Murray, Hank Greenberg and Jimmie Foxx.”
This is the biggest problem with the arguments against
McGriff. They are all premised on false logic. If you look at WAR, OPS+, or
JAWS, you are directly measuring him against all of the PED users. Let’s take a
look at McGriff’s career arch. The following table, with modifications, was
borrowed from ESPN’s David Schoenfield.[6] It
shows how McGriff ranked among first basemen on a yearly basis in several
categories. Note the drop off in his overall rankings between 1994 and 1995.
|
HR
|
Rank
|
RBI
|
Rank
|
OPS
|
Rank
|
OPS+
|
Rank
|
WAR
|
Rank
|
oWAR
|
Rank
|
1988
|
34
|
1st
|
82
|
9th
|
.928
|
1st
|
157
|
2nd
|
6.2
|
2nd
|
5.1
|
4th
|
1989
|
36
|
1st
|
92
|
8th
|
.924
|
2nd
|
165
|
2nd
|
6.7
|
2nd
|
6.2
|
2nd
|
1990
|
35
|
3rd
|
88
|
6th
|
.930
|
3rd
|
153
|
3rd
|
5.2
|
3rd
|
5.5
|
2nd
|
1991
|
31
|
2nd
|
106
|
3rd
|
.890
|
3rd
|
147
|
3rd
|
3.3
|
8th
|
4.3
|
4th
|
1992
|
35
|
2nd
|
104
|
3rd
|
.950
|
3rd
|
165
|
3rd
|
5.2
|
3rd
|
5.3
|
3rd
|
1993
|
37
|
2nd
|
101
|
5th
|
.924
|
5th
|
144
|
7th
|
4.2
|
8th
|
4.2
|
7th
|
1994
|
34
|
3rd
|
94
|
3rd
|
1.012
|
3rd
|
157
|
3rd
|
4.5
|
3rd
|
3.9
|
3rd
|
1995
|
27
|
9th
|
93
|
8th
|
.850
|
9th
|
119
|
9th
|
1.5
|
12th
|
1.7
|
13th
|
1996
|
28
|
11th
|
107
|
12th
|
.859
|
9th
|
120
|
11th
|
1.6
|
15th
|
2
|
13th
|
1997
|
22
|
15th
|
97
|
13th
|
.797
|
18th
|
106
|
19th
|
0.2
|
20th
|
0.9
|
20th
|
1998
|
19
|
19th
|
81
|
21st
|
.815
|
18th
|
111
|
18th
|
2.9
|
13th
|
2
|
18th
|
1999
|
32
|
9th
|
104
|
11th
|
.957
|
6th
|
142
|
4th
|
4
|
8th
|
4.6
|
5th
|
2000
|
27
|
14th
|
106
|
8th
|
.826
|
18th
|
110
|
20th
|
0.2
|
24th
|
1.7
|
19th
|
2001
|
31
|
10th
|
102
|
9th
|
.930
|
7th
|
144
|
6th
|
3.7
|
10th
|
3.7
|
10th
|
2002
|
30
|
6th
|
103
|
7th
|
.858
|
12th
|
125
|
12th
|
2.1
|
14th
|
2.7
|
12th
|
In 1991, his 31 homers and 106 RBIs were good for 2nd
and 3rd respectively. Ten years later, his 31 homers and 102 RBIs in
2001 ranked 10th and 9th. His .890 OPS in 1991 was good
for 3rd, whereas his .930 OPS in 2001 ranked only 9th. As
such, his 147 OPS+ in 1991, which ranked 3rd, fell to 144 in 2001
and was good for only 6th. Similarly, the 4.3 oWAR in 1991, which
ranked 4th, became 3.7 in 2001 and ranked 10th.
Between 1988 and 1994, among players with at least 100 plate
appearances, only Frank Thomas and Barry Bonds posted a higher OPS+ than
McGriff. In fact, let’s take a look at McGriff’s rankings among first basemen
between 1988 and 1994.
Rank
|
WAR
|
|
oWAR
|
|
OPS+
|
|
1
|
Fred
McGriff
|
35.3
|
Fred
McGriff
|
34.5
|
Frank
Thomas
|
184
|
2
|
Will
Clark
|
32.8
|
Will
Clark
|
32.5
|
Fred McGriff
|
155
|
3
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
29.9
|
Frank
Thomas
|
31.9
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
155
|
4
|
Frank
Thomas
|
28.7
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
26.5
|
Will
Clark
|
146
|
5
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
23
|
Mark
McGwire
|
20.8
|
Mark
McGwire
|
140
|
6
|
Mark
McGwire
|
22.8
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
20.5
|
John
Olerud
|
137
|
7
|
Mark
Grace
|
21.4
|
John
Kruk
|
19.3
|
John
Kruk
|
134
|
8
|
John
Kruk
|
19.1
|
Mark
Grace
|
18
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
132
|
9
|
John
Olerud
|
17.8
|
Cecil
Fielder
|
16.7
|
Cecil
Fielder
|
130
|
10
|
Wally
Joyner
|
17.1
|
Kent
Hrbek
|
16.3
|
Randy
Milligan
|
128
|
11
|
Don
Mattingly
|
17
|
John
Olerud
|
15.6
|
Kent
Hrbek
|
127
|
12
|
Kent
Hrbek
|
16.3
|
Wally
Joyner
|
15
|
Glenn
Davis
|
126
|
13
|
Cecil
Fielder
|
15.3
|
Don
Mattingly
|
14.3
|
Mo
Vaughn
|
125
|
14
|
Eddie
Murray
|
14
|
Randy
Milligan
|
13.1
|
Alvin
Davis
|
125
|
15
|
Dave
Magadan
|
13.8
|
Eddie
Murray
|
12.8
|
Hal
Morris
|
121
|
16
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
13.5
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
12.6
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
119
|
17
|
Randy
Milligan
|
13.3
|
Dave
Magadan
|
11.7
|
Mark
Grace
|
119
|
18
|
Glenn
Davis
|
11.5
|
Glenn
Davis
|
11.1
|
Eddie
Murray
|
119
|
19
|
Hal
Morris
|
9.2
|
Alvin
Davis
|
8.9
|
Nick
Esasky
|
119
|
20
|
Alvin
Davis
|
7.9
|
Hal
Morris
|
8.3
|
Wally
Joyner
|
117
|
McGriff leads in both WAR and oWAR and trails only Thomas in
OPS+. Now let’s look at where he stands between 1995 and 2002.
Rank
|
WAR
|
|
oWAR
|
|
OPS+
|
|
1
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
48.6
|
Jim
Thome
|
47.2
|
Mark
McGwire
|
183
|
2
|
Jim
Thome
|
44.4
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
46.4
|
Jim
Thome
|
159
|
3
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
36.7
|
Jason
Giambi
|
39.7
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
155
|
4
|
Jason
Giambi
|
36.3
|
Mark
McGwire
|
38.1
|
Jason
Giambi
|
152
|
5
|
John
Olerud
|
35.9
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
33.8
|
Todd
Helton
|
142
|
6
|
Mark
McGwire
|
34.3
|
John
Olerud
|
30.3
|
Carlos
Delgado
|
142
|
7
|
Todd
Helton
|
28.8
|
Carlos
Delgado
|
30.2
|
Rafael
Palmeiro
|
140
|
8
|
Carlos
Delgado
|
28.6
|
Mo
Vaughn
|
24.9
|
Mo
Vaughn
|
136
|
9
|
Mark
Grace
|
25.6
|
Todd
Helton
|
24.6
|
John
Olerud
|
131
|
10
|
Mo
Vaughn
|
22.5
|
Mark
Grace
|
21
|
Erubiel
Durazo
|
128
|
11
|
Tino
Martinez
|
21.1
|
Fred
McGriff
|
19.3
|
Will
Clark
|
125
|
12
|
Will
Clark
|
17.2
|
Tino
Martinez
|
17.8
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
122
|
13
|
Fred
McGriff
|
16.2
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
17.3
|
Fred
McGriff
|
122
|
14
|
Andres
Galarraga
|
14.5
|
Will
Clark
|
16.3
|
Mark
Grace
|
121
|
15
|
Jeff
Conine
|
13.2
|
David
Segui
|
14.7
|
David
Segui
|
120
|
16
|
David
Segui
|
13.1
|
Jeff
Conine
|
12.2
|
Richie
Sexson
|
119
|
17
|
Eric
Karros
|
12.4
|
Tony
Clark
|
11.7
|
Tino
Martinez
|
115
|
18
|
Jeff
King
|
11.7
|
Eric
Karros
|
11.4
|
Tony
Clark
|
114
|
19
|
Wally
Joyner
|
11.3
|
Richie
Sexson
|
10
|
Eric
Karros
|
113
|
20
|
Tony
Clark
|
11.2
|
Wally
Joyner
|
9.2
|
Sean
Casey
|
112
|
He fell from 1st, 1st, and 2nd
from the 1988-1994 time frame to 13th, 11th, 13th
in the 1995-2002 time frame. Take a look at his production during these eras.
|
PA
|
R
|
H
|
2B
|
HR
|
RBI
|
BB
|
SO
|
BA
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
1988-94
|
4353
|
644
|
1062
|
186
|
242
|
667
|
619
|
814
|
.288
|
.390
|
.545
|
.935
|
1995-2002
|
5050
|
607
|
1267
|
222
|
216
|
793
|
586
|
877
|
.288
|
.371
|
.489
|
.860
|
He hit for less power as he aged, and what used to be home
runs turned into doubles. But his production did not fall off to the point his
rankings would drop as much as they did if not for many players altering the
proverbial playing field.
Let’s move on the USA Today’s Paul White, discussing “Why he
shouldn’t be inducted: Because he was never the best at his position in his
era. He never finished higher than fourth in MVP voting, never hit more than 37
homers in a season, never drove in more than 107 runs. At first base, those numbers
don’t rise above a usually strong crowd of peers. Even with his longevity,
McGriff’s WAR is 48.2, 48th all-time among first baseman and below
others who have been passed over for the Hall, including John Olerud, Will
Clark and Keith Hernandez.”[7]
There is a lot to address here. First, with modifications to WAR, McGriff’s WAR is 52.6, which stands at 27th all-time, and yes, it trails Olerud, Clark, and Hernandez. However, in looking at strictly offensive WAR, McGriff’s 55.6 leads Clark (54.8), Olerud (48.1), and Hernandez (45.6). McGriff’s poor defense cripples his overall WAR. And his great offensive ability was destroyed by the PED-era in which he was subjected, as the above tables illustrate. Over the course of McGriff’s career, his 162-game average consists of a .284 batting average, 32 home runs, 102 RBIs, and a .886 OPS. This from a man who played 140+ games in 14 seasons, compared to McGwire who did it 8 times. How many players can say that?
One final note: Not only did the PED-users overshadow
McGriff’s consistently good numbers, they also robbed him of that “Wow” factor.
Sometimes, Hall of Fame voters look beyond the statistics. Some voters “award
bonus points for cachet, personal magnetism and a certain “wow” factor. It
helps explain why Ozzie Smith is in Cooperstown and Alan Trammell will probably
never get there.”[8] 30
homer/100 RBI seasons were impressive once upon a time. After the McGwire/Sosa
home run race of 1998, anything less than 60 homers was nothing special. Heck,
Sosa hit 63 homers or more 3 times, and wasn’t the league leader in any of
those years. It was an era which included future 1st ballot Hall of
Famers Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux converting into power hitters for Nike commercials
because “Chicks dig the long ball.”
Every year, members of the Baseball Writers’ Association of
America are sent a Hall of Fame ballot. The instructions state, “Voting shall
be based upon the player’s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship,
character, and contribution to the team(s) on which the player played.” Fred
McGriff exemplifies each of these characteristics. He continues to be punished
for the PED-users against whom he competed. Sabermetricians need to learn their
statistical methodologies do not accurately measure a clean player’s
performance during the Steroid-era. McGriff continues to be robbed. It is time
for the voters to correct it.
[1] This is
a reference to a famous 80’s commercial. IBM is not affiliated with this
website in any way. The views and opinions are those of the Highway to Hall
only.
[2] 17 men
now belong in the club.
[3] This
club now has 28 members.
[4] Jaffe,
Jay. JAWS and the 2014 Hall of Fame ballot: Fred McGriff. Jay Jaffe. Available
at mlb.si.com/2013/12/12/jaws-and-the-2014-hall-of-fame-ballot-fred-mcgriff/ December 12, 2013 .
[5]
Greenwell makes case for ’88 MVP. Espn.com news services. Available at
sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1993112. February 17, 2005.
[6] Schoenfield,
David. Fred McGriff on the Hall of Fame border. Available at
espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/19729/fred-mcgriff-on-the-hall-of-fame-border.
January 7, 2012 .
[7] White,
Paul. Hall candidate: Fred McGriff deserves better. Paul White. Available at www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2013/01/02/fred-mcgriff-hall-of-fame-candidate/1803471/
January 2, 2013 .
[8] Crasnick,
Jerry. Debate rages in Rice’s last year on ballot. Available at
sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?id=3787535. December 26, 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment